CSDRās buy-in rules will hinder, not help the market, survey shows
28 November 2019 London
Image: Shutterstock
The majority of the market participants expect the incoming EU buy-in provisions, aimed at improving settlement discipline, to negatively impact market efficiency and liquidity, according to new market research.
The results of a survey by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), released yesterday, have prompted calls by industry stakeholders for EU regulators to go back to the drawing board to fix fundamental errors that have caused the buy-in rules to now not be fit-for-purpose.
ICMAās survey revealed that 84 percent of respondents believed the buy-in regime would be detrimental to the market, with 56.25 percent suggesting it would āworsenā market liquidity and efficiency and a further 23.13 percent saying it would āsignificantly worsenā the trading environment.
Only 9.38 percent said it would improve the market.
The survey garnered 44 respondents including 12 securities lending and repo desks, 16 buy-side firms and 16 sell-side firms.
The CSDR buy-in rules are currently officially slated to come into force in September 2020 but ESMA as there are fundamental technical issues with its implementation that wonāt be addressed until SWIFTās annual November update.
Once in place, the rules create a mandatory obligation for trading parties to execute buy-ins against counterparties who fail to settle their trades within a required period.
The requirements will apply to trades that are intended to settle on EU international central securities depositories (ICSD) and CSDs.
ICMAās report has warned that the buy-in rules will cause several unintended consequences and change securities lending participantsā behaviour as new risks will be introduced and overall market liquidity will likely be reduced.
More than half of survey respondent firms have plans to adapt their operational processes and approaches to trading and risk management, with repo and securities lending businesses leading the field, according to ICMA.
Commenting on the associationās report, ICMA's senior director in market practice and regulatory policy team, Andrew Hill, said he was not surprised by the results, adding that ātaking something [the buy-in process] that is currently a contractual remedy and a risk management tool and altering it so radically is questionable."
āThis was always going to fail and it was never going to help market liquidity,ā he added.
Unlimited potential fails costs
Hill explained that the reality of the scale of the problem that transaction fails in the bond market posed was unclear and that there are āso many better tools to useā to address it.
In ICMAās report, the association predicted that bid-ask spreads of all bond sub-classes will āmore than doubleā, with covered bonds and illiquid investment-grade credit seeing the biggest impact.
In absolute price terms, ICMA noted, the impact is most notable at the lower end of the credit spectrum, with significant increases for emerging markets, high yield, and illiquid investment-grade corporate bonds.
āThere is a flaw in the regulation which means the cost to the failing party could potentially be significantly higher than with the current buy-in method,ā Hill said. āItās very dangerous for lending securities as well because if you lend a security but donāt get it back you may be able to pass on the buy-in costs but if thereās a loss due to asymmetry in the buy-in rules dynamic then thatās a consequential loss and cannot be passed on.ā
Hill explained that EU regulators have been clear that maintaining securities lending market liquidity is important but by introducing these new risks, thatās is only going to disincentivise new or existing market participants and create a āliquidity death spiralā.
Possible solutions
With the extent of the potentially damaging effects of the buy-in rules laid bare, Hill is now calling on the European Commission to take heed of ICMAās report and take steps to rectify the marketās concerns.
āI would like the commission to really consider the possible impacts and go back to the way they focused on liquidity when drafting the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive transparency framework.ā
āWe currently have an effective framework for over-the-counter buy-ins in the form of the ICMA buy-in rules, which are a contractual mechanism thatās existed for decades.ā
Hill added that in order for the buy-in rules to work they shouldnāt be overly prescriptive in terms of timing, and should include exemptions, or at least a staggered implementation timeline, for illiquid bonds that would be most likely to cause losses during the buy-in process.
Elsewhere in the report, further concerns were raised about a general lack of understanding of the terms of CSDR and its buy-in rules.
In answering whether the wider market was cognisant of the requirements and likely impacts of the regulation, the vast majority of all three demographics of respondents (buy-side, sell-side and securities lending and repo desks) reported a 'limited awareness' or 'very little awareness' of the requirements and likely impacts of the regulation.
The results of a survey by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), released yesterday, have prompted calls by industry stakeholders for EU regulators to go back to the drawing board to fix fundamental errors that have caused the buy-in rules to now not be fit-for-purpose.
ICMAās survey revealed that 84 percent of respondents believed the buy-in regime would be detrimental to the market, with 56.25 percent suggesting it would āworsenā market liquidity and efficiency and a further 23.13 percent saying it would āsignificantly worsenā the trading environment.
Only 9.38 percent said it would improve the market.
The survey garnered 44 respondents including 12 securities lending and repo desks, 16 buy-side firms and 16 sell-side firms.
The CSDR buy-in rules are currently officially slated to come into force in September 2020 but ESMA as there are fundamental technical issues with its implementation that wonāt be addressed until SWIFTās annual November update.
Once in place, the rules create a mandatory obligation for trading parties to execute buy-ins against counterparties who fail to settle their trades within a required period.
The requirements will apply to trades that are intended to settle on EU international central securities depositories (ICSD) and CSDs.
ICMAās report has warned that the buy-in rules will cause several unintended consequences and change securities lending participantsā behaviour as new risks will be introduced and overall market liquidity will likely be reduced.
More than half of survey respondent firms have plans to adapt their operational processes and approaches to trading and risk management, with repo and securities lending businesses leading the field, according to ICMA.
Commenting on the associationās report, ICMA's senior director in market practice and regulatory policy team, Andrew Hill, said he was not surprised by the results, adding that ātaking something [the buy-in process] that is currently a contractual remedy and a risk management tool and altering it so radically is questionable."
āThis was always going to fail and it was never going to help market liquidity,ā he added.
Unlimited potential fails costs
Hill explained that the reality of the scale of the problem that transaction fails in the bond market posed was unclear and that there are āso many better tools to useā to address it.
In ICMAās report, the association predicted that bid-ask spreads of all bond sub-classes will āmore than doubleā, with covered bonds and illiquid investment-grade credit seeing the biggest impact.
In absolute price terms, ICMA noted, the impact is most notable at the lower end of the credit spectrum, with significant increases for emerging markets, high yield, and illiquid investment-grade corporate bonds.
āThere is a flaw in the regulation which means the cost to the failing party could potentially be significantly higher than with the current buy-in method,ā Hill said. āItās very dangerous for lending securities as well because if you lend a security but donāt get it back you may be able to pass on the buy-in costs but if thereās a loss due to asymmetry in the buy-in rules dynamic then thatās a consequential loss and cannot be passed on.ā
Hill explained that EU regulators have been clear that maintaining securities lending market liquidity is important but by introducing these new risks, thatās is only going to disincentivise new or existing market participants and create a āliquidity death spiralā.
Possible solutions
With the extent of the potentially damaging effects of the buy-in rules laid bare, Hill is now calling on the European Commission to take heed of ICMAās report and take steps to rectify the marketās concerns.
āI would like the commission to really consider the possible impacts and go back to the way they focused on liquidity when drafting the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive transparency framework.ā
āWe currently have an effective framework for over-the-counter buy-ins in the form of the ICMA buy-in rules, which are a contractual mechanism thatās existed for decades.ā
Hill added that in order for the buy-in rules to work they shouldnāt be overly prescriptive in terms of timing, and should include exemptions, or at least a staggered implementation timeline, for illiquid bonds that would be most likely to cause losses during the buy-in process.
Elsewhere in the report, further concerns were raised about a general lack of understanding of the terms of CSDR and its buy-in rules.
In answering whether the wider market was cognisant of the requirements and likely impacts of the regulation, the vast majority of all three demographics of respondents (buy-side, sell-side and securities lending and repo desks) reported a 'limited awareness' or 'very little awareness' of the requirements and likely impacts of the regulation.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Ķų±¬³Ō¹Ļ Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Ķų±¬³Ō¹Ļ Finance Times
